Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Controlling Changes


History comparison reports highlight the changes between two revisions of a page.Wikis are generally designed with the philosophy of making it easy to correct mistakes, rather than making it difficult to make them. Thus, while wikis are very open, they provide a means to verify the validity of recent additions to the body of pages. The most prominent, on almost every wiki, is the "Recent Changes" page—a specific list numbering recent edits, or a list of edits made within a given time frame. Some wikis can filter the list to remove minor edits and edits made by automatic importing scripts ("bots").

From the change log, other functions are accessible in most wikis: the revision history shows previous page versions and the diff feature highlights the changes between two revisions. Using the revision history, an editor can view and restore a previous version of the article. The diff feature can be used to decide whether or not this is necessary. A regular wiki user can view the diff of an edit listed on the "Recent Changes" page and, if it is an unacceptable edit, consult the history, restoring a previous revision; this process is more or less streamlined, depending on the wiki software used.

In case unacceptable edits are missed on the "recent changes" page, some wiki engines provide additional content control. It can be monitored to ensure that a page, or a set of pages, keeps its quality. A person willing to maintain pages will be warned of modifications to the pages, allowing him or her to verify the validity of new editions quickly. A watchlist is a common implementation of this.

Some wikis also implement "patrolled revisions," in which editors with the requisite credentials can mark some edits as not vandalism. A "flagged revisions" system can prevent edits from going live until they have been reviewed.

6 comments:

  1. A wiki seems to be less formal than most sites. However, it appears to be more user friendly.

    ReplyDelete
  2. From what you have stated in your post, this must be the reason why the teacher would not allow my daughter's class to use Wikipedia for their research paper. I had always wonder why...guess I finally figured it out. But I really like it though.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have always beeen told that it could not be used as a reference, I guess this is why.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Your information is interesting and I did not that wikis was case sensative

    ReplyDelete
  5. I did like the setup we did in class

    ReplyDelete
  6. The first time I used wikis was about 2 months ago and once you get used to them, its pretty easy to edit and control. Good Job

    ReplyDelete